#blimage challenge

In the catch up from being on annual leave, the hashtag #blimage was helpfully highlighted to me by twitter this morning.  #blimage is simple idea from Steve Wheeler and friends is a fun, but quite thought provoking way to encourage teachers (or anyone really) to blog.  With the summer holidays in full swing this blog has had a bit of a hiatus, so this seemed a good way to get back into the swing of things. @GCUBlend was thrown this challenge:

First thoughts were eek! As an initial response my colleague Jim and I created a wordle of things that immediately sprang to mind.

wordle word cloud mage

To me this image immediately makes me think of issues of control, gender, theatre, performance. All of which are analogous with traditional education and the notion of teachers as performers. The notion of the star lecturer, particularly in online learning,  is still prevalent and as the discussion generated by post shows, personalities can have a huge impact on educational experiences.

However as I thought more about the image it over lunch, I was reminded of the anarchic element of traditional puppet theater such as Punch and Judy. Although they can conjure rosy tinted images of happy days past at the sea side, the “plays” themselves were more often than not violent and provided satirical commentary on key issues of the day.

The facade of the theatre and the puppet allowed for a lot of subversion and creativity – both of which are key parts of learning.  So whilst we may feel constrained by what’s behind the curtain, we can make many different types of performances, ones which are audience (student) centred, and adaptive. We don’t have to stick to the same tired, old script, with the same characters.

To carry on the challenge, I offer this picture. What does this bring to your mind?

blimage

Celebrating Learning and Teaching at GCU #GCULT15

This week is our annual celebration of learning and teaching, with events taking place to celebrate and share the excellent practice across each of our three schools.

The week started with  the Principal giving out her annual wards from leaning and teaching at a cross institutional event at GCU LEAD, followed by a number of speakers sharing the vision and the practice of working for the common good.

On Tuesday the focus was on our School of Health and Life Sciences, yesterday (Wednesday) it was the turn of the School for Engineering and Built Environment, and today (Thursday) we wrap things up with Glasgow School for Business and Society – follow #GSBSlt15.  It’s been fantastic to see all the innovation and effective practice that is taking place across the university, and a great way to round off the academic year before we all go on our holidays.

To get a taste of some of the activity you can follow #GCULT15, or explore our Twitter archive.   You can also check out this Storify to get an overview of Monday’s event.

screen shot of twitter archive

GCU Launches OER Policy

Great news, the OER policy Marion Kelt spoke about at one of our recent coffee club meetings, has been approved by the University Executive.

The policy applies to all GCU staff and students who create, or publish OERs to support learning and teaching and gives advice on licencing and citing resources. More information on OERs is available from the library website.

The Library is also developing a repository that will facilitate the storage and sharing of OERs. It will be called EdShare@GCU and is due to launch in the autumn.  We’ve been promised a preview at a coffee club meeting so watch this space.

Marion will also be talking about the policy at the next ALT Scotland meeting being held in GCU LEAD on 18 June, you can register for this free event here.

Creative Commons logo

Exciting times and big plans

Well, it does feel as if a number of things are starting to move forward now across GCU. Last week there was a cross-university consultation event led by Bernadette Kelly, CIO, on the direction of travel for GCU’s new Digital Strategy. Lots of ideas came through about making the student/staff experience more effective and coherent, and ensuring our various business systems are fit for purpose and more ‘joined up’. The learning and teaching aspects still need fleshed out a bit, especially the alignment with the Strategy for Learning, but no doubt these will develop further as discussions continue. Learning and teaching is after all our core ‘business’.

The consultation builds on last year’s discussions around what it might mean for GCU to become a Digital University, based on the work done by Sheila MacNeill and colleagues Prof Keith Smyth (UHI) and Dr Bill Johnson (formerly Strathclyde). The key themes that emerged then are still relevant –

• Digital Infrastructure
• Digital literacy (for students and staff)
• Policy and guidelines
• Learning Analytics
• Open Education & Digital participation
• Need for a GCU definition of ‘Digital University’

These are all big issues which need to be taken forward, but it does feel now as if there is some positive momentum building up and a sense of common purpose emerging.

The day after the consultation event we had a demonstration of some of the features of Lynda.com which provides extensive online resources for a wide range of software applications and approaches to blended learning. A number of us will be piloting and demonstrating these videos and courses to colleagues in June, with a view to deciding whether to go ahead and purchase a university wide licence for staff and students. Extending digital capability is key to moving GCU forward.

The development sessions for the new online postgraduate programmes are also continuing with the 5th in the series taking place next week on the 21st May. Local workshops on curriculum planning have also been held with programme teams in Schools. Marketing, and Governance and Quality have also been involved in looking at some of the broader issues such as marketing and branding, and quality processes for online programmes.

Exciting times indeed. Work on all of these areas will continue over the summer. Summer break? What summer break?!

Presentation from Jisc Learing Analytics Network Meeting, 8 May

The University of Edinburgh hosted the latest meeting of the Jisc Learning Analytics Network last week.  I gave a short presentation highlighting some of the challenges we are facing here at GCU in terms of getting work around learning analytics off the ground.

We are struggling a bit in terms of getting time and support to move forward, however the Jisc Effective Analytics solution could potentially be a very timely stepping stone for us in this respect.  I’m hoping we will be able to bid to be one of the case studies for this work.

All the presentations were very informative, The University of Edinburgh are doing some great work in this area.  Once again showing what a difference investment and clear leadership around online learning and teaching, not just infrastructure can make. It’s so refreshing to hear about work that is not obsessed with retention, or as Wilma Alexander called it the “deficit model”.

Nicola Osbourne also live blogged the event, and I  would recommended reading her post from the day as it provides as something as close to being there as you can get.

If you are a GCU member of staff and are interested in developing approaches to learning analytics, or just finding our more about it, please get in touch with us in the Blended Learning Team in LEAD.

Below is my presentation.

It’s all about BOB

We had a lively discussion at the Coffee Club meeting yesterday around the Box of Broadcasts (BoB) service.  Marian Miller from the library led the discussions by giving us an overview of BoB, some of our GCU useage stats, the clipping, citation and transcript features.

Karla Benske has already written an excellent overview post (available here) of her mini love affair with BoB, and it is definitely worth a read.  One issue we did touch on yesterday was that this is very much a UK based service. Students not based in the UK can’t access the service due to the licence it operates out of. So that is definitely something to consider if using BoB for a flexible, online course.  That said the potential for our UK based students is very compelling, and it is a fantastic way to easily access some rich content.

Marian’s Slides

Why I love BoB (Box of Broadcasts)

This post has been written by Dr Karla Benske, a lecturer in GCU LEAD.

Since I will be missing this month’s Blended Learning Coffee Club, I thought that least I can do is let you all know why I love BoB (Box of Broadcasts). It is a subscription service and GCU is one of the many institutions in the UK who have subscribed to its service. I was introduced to BoB in early 2014 through a GCU Library presentation on BoB and what can I say? It was love at first sight. An archive that covers well over 60 different TV and Radio channels, including foreign language ones (mainly French and German), that allows subscribers to request and record programmes within 30 days of broadcast (up to 5 requests per day!) and that offers additional access to the BBC archive of programmes broadcast before BoB was born. On top of that, users can create clips from programmes to focus on one specific item or theme, rather than watching the whole programme. I find this particularly useful for the classroom, when there is not enough time to watch or listen to a lengthy broadcast. Please note: I am not terribly good at dealing with technical things, like using software to make a clip, but within BoB and, with a little bit of practice, it is actually very easy to do it. What is not to love about that?

BoB enables us as academics to embed programmes or clips into our teaching delivery, be it in the classroom or online. It therefore allows for a varied learning experience for students, complementing a lecture, seminar, or the preparation for class and/or an assessment. It captures or re-captures students’ attention and supports those with learning styles that prefer audio-visual to text-based information. Moreover, from an accessibility point of view, most television programmes have a transcript that runs parallel to the streaming, which is great, although this is not yet available for radio programmes.

Some may say, ‘Well, that sounds great, but how does that work?’ Firstly, to log on, all you need is to click on the login button, choose your institution and follow the instructions (for GCU staff/students it’s your GCU domain name and password). If your institution has not subscribed to the service, you won’t be able to access BoB, unfortunately. However, I would hope that it encourages you to suggest to the appropriate persons that a BoB subscription may be worthwhile for your institution. Secondly, an example: for the FAIR Curriculum workshop I use four clips from the film ‘Freedom Writers’ to frame the workshop and to:

  • showcase how students might feel excluded;
  • show a ‘hot moment’ in the classroom to encourage discussion;
  • identify ways to engage disaffected students;
  • to teach them to relate their personal experiences of discrimination to historical events and learn about the theories derived from researching specific historical events.

Screen shot of BOB playlist page

For me personally, the beauty of using these clips is that they demonstrate in different stages how we can use L&T approaches to make our teaching more inclusive and accessible. The fact that these are film clips also makes it more engaging and it triggers discussions, which I find, is any teacher’s dream come true.

Yes, some may argue that using a US film about a teacher and her students in a State High School in one of the most deprived areas of Los Angeles does not relate to anything we do here at GCU. That is a fair point. But what I am trying to showcase is not the context, but to encourage participants to discuss the teacher’s responses to the challenges she encounters and how her approaches enables all the students, regardless of their backgrounds and/or learning abilities to participate, aspire and achieve a High School education. In my view, such discussions open up space for ideas and for identifying solutions to the challenges that we face and it encourages us to reflect upon our teaching practice.

Another hobbyhorse of mine is listening to the radio and BoB gives me the opportunity to hold on to those snippets that grab one’s attention, but are gone within minutes. Here, like with the television programmes, it is the fact that now I can share these snippets that caught my attention and made me think about something for a little while after listening to the radio.

However, being in love also comes with some downsides, things one has to learn to accept and tolerate and BoB is no different. There are occasional hiccups, like the ‘programme unavailable to stream’ message, when you want to play something or a recording that has become stuck in recording mode. The former normally sorts itself out after a while or after a few retries, the latter can be resolved by contacting BoB by email. BoB’s FAQ section is very good and comprehensive and when I contact BoB by email, there is always a response within a short period of time. Another bugbear is the fact that, unfortunately, BoB is only available within the UK and will not allow the streaming of programmes outwith the country. So, we can’t use BoB for conference presentations, which I had hoped I could. And I don’t know how this affects internationally available online courses, although I would hope that a solution for the latter could be found. Why? Well, after participating in a number of MOOCs out of curiosity and to learn how others run online courses, I have to say that watching talking heads for weeks is not the most engaging way of learning and teaching and being able to incorporate clips of radio and television programmes is a way of breaking up this particular pattern of delivery without having to rely too much on YouTube and other means of embedding audio-visual material.

Overall, I am in love with BoB, despite the few setbacks I mentioned above. Only this morning, when logging on to BoB, I saw a recommended listing on the homepage that made me curious and after watching the programme for short while, I decided to make use of it. I would have never recorded it, but thanks to someone else who did, I had the fortune of finding yet another gem in BoB’s treasure trove for my learning and teaching practice. Another plus side of BoB is that you can search for other users’ playlists. Although the search for playlists is a bit clunky (you need to put in the exact name of the playlist), it allows for colleagues to share their lists and to see what other people have put together in relation to a specific topic. Feel free to search for and have a look at my (ever expanding) GCU_KHB_FAIR_Curriculum Playlist. BoB can be followed on Twitter @bufvc_bob, which is another way of keeping up with the latest, and how I came across a ‘World Autism Day Playlist’ that was shared by using the BoB Twitter feed. It also includes information on some of the hiccups as they happen.

Please do logon to BoB (for GCU staff/students: user domain and password) and explore it for yourself. It’s definitely worth it!

4th Online development meeting: Dr Christine Sinclair: silence, not-yetness, manifestos, and much more

We were delighted that Dr Christine Sinclair (University of Edinburgh) was able to join us this early today for our 4th online development meeting.

Christine has a wealth of experience in online learning and teaching.  Hearing about her journey from student on the MSc in Digital Education  to her current position where she is about to take over as the Programme Director was fascinating.

some things I've learned

Christine’s recent experiences as a student have really shaped her thinking, design and teaching of her current online programmes. Christine has also been part of the pioneering MOOC developments at Edinburgh  and is part of a team that regularly teaches cohorts of nearly 50,000 students.

Christine’s presentation highlighted some key areas around the student experience that we are already thinking about, particularly around student engagement.

We talked quite a bit around the dreadful “lurking” issue. As Christine pointed out, in online situations, silence has many meanings, and many of them are positive. Dialogue is important but can be scary for learners and academics alike. We need to think about our own preferences for synchronous and asynchronous activities, our own conventions and in partnership with students develop effective learning environments.

This relates to learner confidence. Whilst many online learning scenarios seem to naturally create supportive peer networks, we can’t assume that they always will – particularly in masters level courses where students have many other pressures on their time.

Christine shared some lovely examples of how group working and had fostered peer reassurance and support in her students.   Expectations need to be explicit.   Learners need to know the amount of time, the types of technology and activities they will be expected to use.

Similarly staff need to be realistic about their time and not succumb to the temptation of checking things just before going to bed, or if they wake up in the middle of the night 🙂 Staff time is often underestimated and we are keen to ensure that we start to get a realistic view of the actual time involved in developing and running fully online courses from our teams.

Team course design, development  and regular meetings to catch up on what is working well/not so well have become  integral to Christine’s team.  So although Christine warned about the danger of “fiddling in the middle” (of a course that is running) she also  advocated the need for experimentation and the mind set of “let’s try and see”. We were pointed to work her colleagues Jen Ross and Amy Collier have just published around what they are calling “not-yetness”. Jen and Amy use this term to describe the messiness and not fully understood “stuff” that is often experienced when developing online learning and teaching.

We were also reminded of the online teaching manifesto that Christine and her colleagues developed and are currently revising. There seemed to be some appetite to create a GCU version of this. So the Blended Learning Team will do just that and share for comment/suggestions in a future post.

All in all a really useful session and once again we’d like to thank Christine for taking the time to share her experiences with us here at GCU.

 GCU_Sinclair (slides .ppt)

Blended Learning Team at Blackboard, #oer15 and Talis Insight Conferences

The Blended Learning Team were out and about last week presenting and participating at a number of national and international conferences.

Jim Emery attended the Blackboard Teaching and Learning Conference at the University of Liverpool. Jim presented a paper titled “ Rubrics – Turnitin, Blackboard and Excel”.  Jim was also part of a panel session on delivering MOOCs using the Blackboard Open Education Platform where he shared experiences of last year’s GCU Games On event.

Sheila MacNeill was a keynote speaker at the international OER 15 conference at the Royal College of Music and Drama in Cardiff last week.  Her keynote “Airing my Open Washing” dealt with some of the challenges of mainstreaming open educational practice.  A recording of the presentation is available here.

Sheila was also an invited speaker at the learning analytics session at the Talis Insight Conference in Birmingham. As well as presenting on developments at GCU, Sheila was also part of an expert panel.